Translate

Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekПереведите к русскому/RussianOversetter til Norsk/NorwegianÖversätta till Svensk/Swedishहिन्दी अनुवाद करने के लिए/Hindi
Tradueix al català/CatalanTulkot uz latviešu/LatvianPreložiť do slovenčiny/SlovakVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/ArabicTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/French
Traduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese Simplified中文翻译/Chinese TraditionalПереклад на українську/Ukrainian
Image of Operating System Concepts
Image of RHCE Red Hat Certified Engineer Linux Study Guide (Exam RH302) (Certification Press)
Image of XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Programmer's Reference (Programmer to Programmer)
Image of Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment, Second Edition (Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series)

Switching Linux Web Browser To Google Chrome

I finally broke down and decided to switch to using the Google Chrome web browser on my Linux platforms instead of Mozilla Firefox. Installation was easy; just download the appropriate RPM or DEB from the Google Chrome download area and install it.

Reading an EULA is, as always, interesting and Google Chrome’s EULA was no different Turns out that Google Chrome is licensed under the infamous AVC patent portfolio and under an Adobe license for a Flash player plug-in which includes the following clause

The Chrome-Reader Software may not be used to render any PDF or EPUB documents that utilize digital rights management protocols or systems other than Adobe DRM

Another interesting paragraph in the EULA is the following:

20.2 From time to time, Google Chrome may check with remote servers (hosted by Google or by third parties) for available updates to extensions, including but not limited to bug fixes or enhanced functionality. You agree that such updates will be automatically requested, downloaded, and installed without further notice to you.

However, you can disable the automatic updating feature by touching /etc/default/google-chrome before installed the Chrome package. If you forget this step when installing Chrome, you can always disable the chrome repo, e.g. /etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome.repo for Fedora/Centos/Redhat.

So why did I switch from Firefox? For one thing, the Firefox interface is becoming too cluttered and tired looking. More annoying however was the fact that Fedora, which is the main GNU/Linux distribution which I develop on, used to install numerous language plug-ins by default. That seems to have stopped recently. However, I am very happy with both the performance and uncluttered look and feel of Google Chrome and see no reason to switch back to Mozilla Firefox.

I suspect that unless the leadership of the Mozilla Firefox development changes, Mozilla Firefox’s share of the web browser market has peaked and will slowly decay as Webkit-based browsers such as Google Chrome, Apple Safari and Opera mature.
 

Comments are closed.